Belgrade vs Chiang Mai
Cost of living and a cost-only FI reference estimate, side by side.
Weighing Belgrade against Chiang Mai? Compare cost of living and a cost-only FI estimate, plus livability and generic visa and tax-residency signals. The timeline excludes taxes, eligibility, FX, inflation and sequence risk.
| Metric | Belgrade | Chiang Mai | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost | $1,100/mo | $950/mo | Chiang Mai |
| Cost-only years estimate | 12.2 yrs | 12.8 yrs | Chiang Mai |
| Burn reduction | 45% | 53% | Chiang Mai |
| Tax context | Low | Low | — |
| Visa context | Moderate | Easy | Chiang Mai |
| Safety | 3 | 3 | — |
| Internet | 60 Mbps | 60 Mbps | — |
The verdict
- Chiang Mai is about 14% cheaper per month ($950/mo vs $1,100/mo).
- Chiang Mai leads the cost-only model by about 0.6 years.
- In the cost-only model, Chiang Mai ranks ahead. Taxes, visas, FX, inflation and sequence risk are excluded.
Run your own numbers
The figures above run one fixed reference profile. Enter your income, spending and savings, complete onboarding, then subscribe to Pro to reveal your personal FI Score and city plan.